|
|
Dispelling The
Myths |
“Trap-Neuter-Return” (TNR) is the
process of trapping feral cats in humane traps, having them altered
and vaccinated, and returning them to their original location. In a
TNR program, a feral cat colony caretaker, who is usually a
volunteer rescue worker, feeds the cats on a regular basis and
brings them to a veterinarian if they require medical assistance.
The resultant group of cats, including any new cats entering the
caretaker's sphere, is known as a managed feral cat colony.
Some locales have passed, or are trying to pass, ordinances that
will cause the suffering and death of homeless cats by eradicating
TNR.
The empirical evidence is indisputable that TNR is the most
effective way to help reduce the number of homeless feral cats in
both urban and suburban areas. For example, in Hamilton, New
Jersey, TNR has resulted in Township health department statistics
showing that the number of homeless cats killed last year is less
than 20 percent of the 571 cats put to death in Hamilton five years
ago. Numbers also indicate that fewer strays are brought to the
shelter each year. Township spokesperson Rich McClellan attributed
the decreasing number of cats killed in shelters to the work of TNR
caregivers. Gwyn Sondike, who for the past year has served on a NJ
state task force appointed by Gov. James E. McGreevey to examine
animal welfare, stated: "It's actually more expensive to have
animal control officers go out and find these cats and have them
euthanized than it is to have members of these (cat welfare) groups
trap, neuter and release them." According to Lucinda Tucker, who
operates the TNR plan, trapping and killing a cat can cost a
township between $75 and $125, while TNR costs about $50 and is
paid for by volunteer organizations.1
Traditional, agency-run attempts to trap and kill cats have
historically resulted in greater numbers -- and greater suffering
for that reason alone -- of stray animals, than have well-planned
systems to trap, neuter, and return cats. TNR, in conjunction with
public education and low-cost spay/neuter clinics, stabilizes
numbers and facilitates the eventual elimination of colonies of
homeless cats.
Moreover, there is great public resistance to the killing of
homeless animals. Compassionate people actively interfere with
efforts to harm cats. Costly trap-and-kill attempts cannot work
without public support.
How should the animal advocate dispel the myths associated with
TNR?
Animal advocacy groups who have opposed TNR rely on misguided
arguments.2 Here is the reality:
Myth: Feral cats are wild animals.
Fact: Calling these cats wild is a misnomer. They are
homeless domestic animals who have no choice but to surive "in the
wild."
Myth: Animal advocates should oppose TNR because they
receive "countless reports of incidents in which cats-'managed' or
not-suffer and die horrible deaths because they must fend for
themselves outdoors."
Fact: Cats are subject to illness and death just as we are,
even when cared for in loving homes. The solution is not to kill
any living being who might suffer and die, but to treat any
sentient individual with kindness and respect.
TOP
Myth: TNR should be ended because "highly contagious
diseases such as rhinotrachitis, feline AIDS, and rabies are common
in 'outdoor cats.'"
Fact: Rabies is not commonly found within feral cat
colonies.3 Where humans are concerned, the danger of
rabies is relatively slight. During 2001, 49 states and Puerto Rico
reported only 1 case of rabies in a human, according to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Canada did not report any cases
of rabies in human beings during 2001.4
During the TNR debate in Florida, Dr. Julie Levy spoke on behalf of
feral cats at the Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission (FWC)
hearing and stated, "In 2002, cats represented less than 4% of the
rabid animals identified in the state.... Regardless, feral cat TNR
programs routinely immunize cats against rabies." Dr. Levy also
addressed other infectious diseases such as Feline Leukemia Virus
(FeLV) and Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) by stating that, "A
report published from the University of Florida on more than 1,800
feral cats demonstrated only 4% to be infected with feline leukemia
virus or feline immunodeficiency virus, which is similar to that
found in pet cats."5
Myth: Advocates should oppose TNR because although altering
feral cats prevents the suffering of future generations, it does
little to improve the quality of life of the cats who are left
outdoors. Allowing feral cats to continue their daily struggle for
survival in hostile environments is not usually a humane
option.
Fact: TNR was created to solve this problem. A properly
managed feral cat colony provides the cats with daily food, water,
shelter, and medical care when needed. Therefore, the very people
-- feral cat colony caretakers -- that some groups oppose are
actively working toward minimizing the "daily struggle." Granted,
the "struggle" is not completely eradicated, but TNR is working
toward that by spay/neutering all feral cats, thus phasing out
feral cat colonies.
Myth: TNR programs are acceptable only when the cats are
isolated from roads, people, and other animals who could harm them;
constantly attended to by people who not only feed them, but care
for their medical needs; located in an area where they do not have
contact with wildlife; and located in an area where the weather is
temperate.
Fact: There are virtually no feral cat colonies that fulfill
all of these conditions. Although TNR caregivers provide food and
necessary veterinary care, colonies are often located in urban
areas where people dump animals, and any animal who spends time
outside is at risk of harm from roads, people, or other animals,
including wildlife. Do not accept any group's insistence on these
impossible conditions when they claim that they do not oppose the
practice but rather want it to be done only under utopian
conditions. There are no utopian conditions. Support for the work
of feral cats and their caretakers means opposing TNR bans.
Myth: State wildlife agencies should decide because feral
cats are "wild animals."6
Fact: Feral cats are not "wild animals." A bobcat is a wild
cat; a feral cat is a homeless domestic cat who is afraid of
humans.
TOP
Myth: Feral cats are responsible for bird and wildlife
decline.
Fact: While we acknowledge that outdoor cats do occasionally
kill birds and other wildlife, the main cause of decline is habitat
loss, which is caused by humans, not cats. National Geographic News
reports that the declining bird populations reflect growing threats
to many bird species resulting from habitat loss and fragmentation
caused by development and other human activities.7
Moreover, conservation groups and government biologists estimate
that communications towers (cell phone, television) kill from 4 to
50 million birds a year -- and at least 50 species are threatened
or endangered. The construction of new towers creates a potentially
significant impact on migratory birds.8 Furthermore, two
French researchers Moller & Eritzoe examined birds killed by
cats vs. those that met accidental deaths by crashing into windows.
They examined the birds for various factors, the most significant
of which was the health of the bird. They found that while windows
were non-discriminating and killed healthy and sickly birds
equally, the birds cats killed were significantly sicklier than
those who crashed into windows.9
A study in 2005 predicts that reducing cat populations would actually cause more harm to birds due to a resulting increase in rat populations.10
A Columbia University study found that "reducing cats'effect on the
ecosystem may actually have a negative impact upon some native
species due to the possibility of 'mesopredator release effect'.
The study also recommended that we confront the cat population
problem with a combination of methods: "enlist the
"trap-neuter-return" style of feral management and combine it with
incentives for owners to sterilize their pet
cats."11
Wildlife biologist Roger Tabor, who is considered by his peers to
be one of the world’s leading experts on cats and has studied
feral cats for over 30 years, is quoted as saying, "The clear
leading animal that’s really putting wildlife at risk is the
human population. We just don’t like to acknowledge that it
is our fault. It’s not a case of the cat being the worst
offender. It isn’t even remotely the worst offender.
It’s us."12
Most important of all: Even where cats might be observed hunting,
killing the cats fails to address this issue because trap and kill
does not set its sights on the long-term goal -- ending the
homeless cat crisis.
Myth: Feral cats pose a risk to public safety.
Fact: A study conducted by Stanford University's Department of Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) found virtually no risk to humans from feral cats and diseases associated with cats. EHS also concluded, after consultation with the Santa Clara County Health Department and Stanford's Department of Comparative Medicine, that there was a general consensus that feral cats pose virtually no health and safety risk to individuals.13
TOP
NOTES:
[1] See “Group deals with feral cat problem,” Trenton
Times, July 6, 2003.
[2] For an example of such erroneous thinking, see "Feral Cats:
Trapping is the Kindest Solution," peta-online.org, claiming:
"Because of the huge number of feral cats and the severe shortage
of good homes, the difficulty of socialization, and the dangers
lurking where most feral cats live, it may be necessary and the
most compassionate choice to euthanize feral cats. You can ask your
veterinarian to do this or, if your local shelter uses an injection
of sodium pentobarbital, take the cats there. Please do not allow
the prospect of euthanasia to deter you from trapping cats. If you
leave them where they are, they will almost certainly die a painful
death." The other myths addressed here are taken from e-mail
correspondence, "PETA position on feral cats" (September 26, 2003,
Bobbi Short, BobbiS@peta.org, PETA Correspondent).
[3] "Rabies Control And Feral Cats In The US," Alley Cat Allies.
Available at http://www.alleycat.org/pdf/rabies.pdf. Accessed
September 29, 2003.
[4] "Public Veterinary Medicine: Public Health - Rabies
surveillance in the United States during 2001," John W. Krebs, MS;
Heather R. Noll, MPH; Charles E. Rupprecht, VMD, PhD; James E.
Childs, ScD. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rabies/Professional/publications/Surveillance/Surveillance01/text01.htm.
Accessed September 29, 2003.
[5] Statement from Dr. Julie Levy, read at the hearing of the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC) on the proposed policy
to eradicate feral cats in Florida. May 30, 2003. Available at
http://www.bestfriends.org/nmhp/ferals26-02.htm. Accessed November
23, 2003.
[6] Many feral cat advocates, including Alley Cat Allies,
erroneously refer to feral cats as "wild animals."
[7] "Quarter of U.S. Birds in Decline, Says Audubon," National
Geographic News, November 5, 2002
[8] "Towering Troubles: Bird Collisions With Communications
Towers." Journey North, 2002
[9] No More Homeless Pets Forum, September 8-12, 2003, Guest:
Nathan Winograd, Topic: Ferals, ferals everywhere, and not sure
what to do?. Available at
http://www.bestfriends.org/nmhp/forumarchive/qa908to912nw2.html#five.
Accessed October 23, 2003.
[10] Fan M, et al, Bull Math Biol, 2005
[11] "Introduced Species Summary Project: Domestic Cat" Danielle
LaBruna, Columbia University, January 29, 2001. Available at
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/cerc/danoff-burg/invasion_bio/inv_spp_summ/Felis_catus.html.
Accessed November 23, 2003.
[12] "Living in the Gray Zone," Estelle Munro. October 2003.
Available at
http://www.bestfriends.org/features/ferals2_101203/grayzone.htm.
Accessed November 5, 2003.
[13] "Feral Cats and Public Safety," Animal Care Services, 2013 Second Street, Berkeley, CA 94710. Available at http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/animalservices/feralpubsafety.html. Accessed February 3, 2005.
©Feral Cat Network. November, 2003. Revised December, 2005.
|
|